The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe

The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe Movie Tie-in Edition (rack) (Narnia) The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe by C.S. Lewis

My initial reading of this book rates a 3.5, but the movie gets 4.5, so I’m giving an overall rating of 4. Probably, like other classics I have read (Pride and Prejudice, for example), the rating goes up over time and I should just give it a 5 now. I like books that grow on you.

I suppose my initial reaction was that I was a little disappointed. I didn’t feel it lived up to the hype that an author of the stature of C.S. Lewis deserved in my mind. Of course I was coming to it as an adult rather than as a child. I remember starting this book somewhere back in my youth, but I do not remember reading more than a couple of chapters. I think it bored me. I was probably too old for it then. Admittedly, it has a slow start. The talking animals are merely cute. It is not until Edmund is imprisoned by the White Witch that we begin to sense something deeper is going on. The ideal age for reading this (or having it read to you) is about 4-8. Most reviews say Grades 4-8. I think that is too old. For older children, I would recommend the Golden Compass trilogy.

Just as Philip Pullman has been criticized for being anti-religion, C.S. Lewis has been criticized for being too Christian. Well, it wouldn’t be C.S. Lewis if it weren’t. He was a theologian, after all. His aim was to write a Christian allegory that would teach children about good versus evil, morality, and good manners. But he doesn’t beat you over the head with it. Indeed, it can be enjoyed on many different levels. Younger children are not going to be sophisticated enough to pick up on the symbolism. They will enjoy a good fantasy adventure with animals that talk. Good triumphs over evil, spring comes after winter, one can redeem oneself after making bad choices, and love is the ultimate sacrifice.

The movie brings this little book to life. The actors are perfectly cast. Who can resist Georgie Henley as Lucy Pevensie? The CGI effects are well done. Aslan looks real and is given a wonderful voice by Liam Neeson. The White Witch is suitably chilling. The action is not always true to the book, but movies never are. Thankfully, it updated C.S. Lewis’s 1950s attitudes about women. I had to roll my eyes a few times in the book, for example – where the boys get to help catch fish for dinner while the girls end up helping in the kitchen.

After watching the movie, I now want to read the rest of the series, especially The Magician’s Nephew, which is a prequel to The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, and tells of the Professor’s adventures in Narnia when he was a boy.

Advertisements

2 Comments

  1. Realizing that my comments come out of a great appreciation of C.S. Lewis, I was a bit astounded by some of what you wrote. I cannot imagine thinking that the movie (as good as it was and I certainly enjoyed it) surpassed the book. Whatever can be portrayed on a screen is never as rich as the genius of imagination. Yes, it was written for children, but, as with a great deal of children’s literature it is wonderfully enjoyed by adults.

    Lewis was not a theologian at any level. He was a professor of Medieval and Renaissance literature. He did not write a Christian allegory (which is a point to point correspondence–Pilgrim’s Progress would be a good example), nor was that his aim, but to write children’s stories which certainly contain pictures of major Christian themes. “The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe” actually came out of single picture Lewis had in his head of a fawn walking through a snowy wood.

    If it is necessary to say–forgive my “persnicketiness.”

    • Dear Pastor Jeff,
      I am delighted that someone is actually reading and commenting on my blog. Thank you!

      I never said the movie surpassed the book. I gave it a higher rating, probably because the second exposure to the story in general raised my appreciation for it. If you read my reviews for Pride and Prejudice, you’ll note that my first rating of that was a 3. And now after several movie versions and fanfic spinoffs, I would give the original story an enthusiastic 5+. Ratings are so artificial anyway, and only reflect an emotional response which changes from day to day. A lot of literary fiction, and books with deeper meanings, require time spent with them. I tried to indicate that, but apparently it didn’t come across.

      I, too, have a great appreciation for C.S. Lewis. So it is surprising (even to me) that I had not actually READ The Chronicles of Narnia until now. Perhaps Lewis was not a theologian in the academic sense, but he did write a number of books (for adults) on Christian topics. I also agree it isn’t an allegory in the strictest sense. Lewis called it a “symbology” rather than an allegory, I believe. I think most people would call any symbolic representation an allegory, though. And I am not writing academic reviews!

      Anyway, I enjoyed your comments, and I completely agree with you.


Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s